zhenzhubay.com

珍珠湾全球网

 找回密码
 用户注册

tag 标签: 起诉书

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表

没有相关内容

相关日志

分享 方舟子就贺梅案的模糊性抹黑
热度 4 岳东晓 2017-1-8 04:47
我在《 方舟子的诚意判断 》中征求读者对方舟子认错诚意的判断,方舟子的意图似乎是把其推特诽谤的责任完全推掉,自己只是更正他人的错误。我认为,从法律上,方舟子的责任是独立的:他并非机械转帖刘牧野的诽谤,而是自己在阅读相关文件之后进行的陈述。我之前给方舟子的条件是在18小时内:(1)删除该诽谤性推特条文;(2)在推特、XYS以及weibo 道歉。方舟子未执行(1),因此我的行动不受任何协议的限制。 今天我看到方舟子的推特上出现下列内容: 刘牧野诽谤案中,相当部分内容涉及夜夜城若干人等对我在贺梅案的作为的诽谤性描述(相关内容参见起诉书)。方舟子现在也试图在贺梅案上对我进行模糊性抹黑。这是极其不道德与不负责任的,方舟子应该拿出打假斗士的勇气,准确指出哪些报道存在哪些不准确。 是个男人嘛,不应该搞这种阴的,应该来明的。 弹指之间,今年已经是贺梅案胜利10周年了。十年之后,该案的历史意义及其主导者依然遭到质疑甚至攻击,这是我们工作做得不够。通过法律手段对诋毁者进行严厉打击,给他们及世人留下难忘的记忆,将作为未来维护贺梅案人权胜利的果实与正义精神的重要手段之一。
个人分类: 贺梅案|8045 次阅读|16 个评论
分享 网教:从特那包案看杨文斌案
热度 3 岳东晓 2015-8-16 03:41
Joel Tenenbaum (鸠儿-特那包)有个网站, 鸠儿反击, http://www.joelfightsback.com/ (目前其内容已经无法浏览), 还有同名的 推特 ,曾经有一度此人是互联网上的英雄,有不少粉丝。 特那包其 人是谁呢? 2007年, 24岁大学毕业生 特那包被 若干音乐唱片公司起诉 ,指控其通过P2P下载约30首歌曲的MP3 。如同所有的这类案子,原告的证据只是一个IP地址与一个P2P用户ID。特那包不蠢,他对朋友说,将一个IP与个人100%对应是无法做到的。接到起诉书之后,他坚持称原告搞错人了,他从来没有安装过P2P软件,对相关软件没有任何知识,他否认那个P2P用户名属于他。后来,原告在特那包计算机上找到了相关的证据,他改称(1)可能是一个寄养在他家的小孩干的;(2)可能是家里的客人干的,(3)可能是小偷干的;(4)可能是他姐妹们干的 。特那包的“大义凛然”赢得了很多互联网民的起哄式支持,哈佛大学法学院教授查尔斯-内森 ( Charles Nesson , the William F. Weld Professor of Law at Harvard Law School )免费充当特那包辩护律师。 但这些辩解通通无效。 内森 教授使出的招数也通通无效。 最后,陪审团裁定特那包蓄意侵权,判处60万美金的赔偿。法官倒是同情特那包,把赔偿减少到 6万。但巡回法院认为法官错误,恢复了60万的赔偿额。(后来法官退休到哈佛去了)。 聪明的读者们看到这要想了。特那包说的可能性确实存在啊,下载歌曲的人躲在计算机后,谁能100%断定就是他呢? 可能是黑客,还可能是外星人干的。原告凭什么可以对特纳包的计算机进行全面检查呢? 读者可能问,如果干脆把计算机硬盘数据清除,或者干脆换个新硬盘如何? 这当然也是不行的。我介绍过的那个 Jammie Thomas-Rasset 就是在感觉不妙后,跑到 Best Buy 把计算机硬盘换了,原硬盘不知去向。她还作证说,她小孩也用她的计算机,可能是小孩干的。但这么做的结果不但不能逃脱干系,似乎反而引起了陪审团的愤怒。该单身母亲被判赔偿上百万。类似的, 在 Arista Records v. Tschirhart 案中,被告也是把硬盘数据清除,结果法庭直接判她败诉。 上面这些事情对于很多没在美国当过被告的来说,也许很难理解。原告的证据仅仅是IP与ID,为什么被告发誓否定之后没有脱身,反而必须交出计算机,反而越陷越深? 计算机里有多少隐私啊?。。。 要搞清这个问题,需要知道一些美国法制的基本概念。 杨文彬案发前,我曾经通知他保存硬盘数据,他说要去买个新硬盘 。 这一点我写在起诉书里了。 PS: 还有网友问,为什么要起诉杨文彬。起诉杨文彬是为了制止其非法行为、并让他对其非法行为负责,并且预防可能的犯罪 --- 而且是在我多次警告无效的情况下。杨本人对于法律行动是不陌生的: 夜夜城仅仅是张贴杨文彬家人的照片并取笑,杨就要向FBI报警 --- 夜夜城这些杨家照片后来被删除了,也许杨的做法起到了作用。杨文彬对本人构成的诽谤与暴力威胁极其恶劣,目前只是追究其民事责任。马力写道 “ 岳可以在诉状中加上暴力威胁网友。证据还有很多。 (8-2 17:26)” 这是一个很好的建议。针对夜夜城的传票将在三个星期内发出,鉴于夜城网主匿名,有知其信息者,可以协助。我也不是24小时打官司,这些事按部就班依法进行。杨文彬案下次听证日期是在9月24日,之前我会递交一份反对,但是不会有太多事。看戏党不必催促。 PPS:至于翰山侵权诽谤案,当然也在循序进行,被告 GAOGAO HAN已经通过EMAIL收到传票,其网站代理也已经将传票寄给 HANSHAN.INFO 。法律的轮子运转是缓慢而坚定的。但一个月内不会有太多动静。当初翰山侵权事发, iMan 是曾经答应如果翰山被诉,他会出钱相助,也许还要其他人向翰山做出了这样的承诺。我认为 iMan 及其他人应该信守其承诺。当然,如果这些人言而无信,那也不奇怪。 United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-11446-RWZ Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al v. Tenenbaum Assigned to: Judge Rya W. Zobel Caseinothercourt: First Circuit, 10-01883 First Circuit, 10-01947 First Circuit, 10-02052 First Circuit, 12-02146 Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement Date Filed: 08/07/2007 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 820 Copyright Jurisdiction: Federal Question Intervenor Plaintiff United States of America representedby Michelle Bennett U.S. Deparmtent of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 202-305-8902 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Plaintiff Sony BMG Music Entertainment a Delaware general partnership representedby John R. Bauer Birnbaum Godkin, LLP 280 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210 617-307-6163 Fax: 617-307-6101 Email: [email protected] TERMINATED: 12/28/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul D Clement Bancroft PLLC 1919 M Street N.W. Suite 470 Washington, DC 20036 202-234-0090 Fax: 202-234-2806 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daniel J. Cloherty Collora LLP 100 High Street 20th Flr. Boston, MA 02110 617-371-1000 Fax: 617-371-1037 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Eve G. Burton Holme Roberts Owen LLP 1700 Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203-4541 303-866-0551 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew Oppenheim Oppenheim Zebrak, LLP 7304 River Falls Potomac, MD 20854 301-299-4986 Email: [email protected] PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Timothy M. Reynolds Bryan Cave HRO 1801 13th Street Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80302 303-444-5955 Fax: 303-866-0200 Email: [email protected] PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Victoria L. Steinberg Collora LLP 100 High Street 20th Flr. Boston, MA 02110 617-371-1000 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Plaintiff Warner Bros. Records, Inc. a Delaware Corporation representedby John R. Bauer (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/28/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul D Clement (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daniel J. Cloherty (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Eve G. Burton (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew Oppenheim (See above for address) PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Timothy M. Reynolds (See above for address) PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Victoria L. Steinberg (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Plaintiff Atlantic Recording Corporation a Delaware Corporation representedby John R. Bauer (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/28/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul D Clement (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daniel J. Cloherty (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Eve G. Burton (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew Oppenheim (See above for address) PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Timothy M. Reynolds (See above for address) PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Victoria L. Steinberg (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Plaintiff Arista Records LLC a Delaware limited liability company representedby John R. Bauer (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/28/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul D Clement (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daniel J. Cloherty (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Eve G. Burton (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew Oppenheim (See above for address) PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Timothy M. Reynolds (See above for address) PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Victoria L. Steinberg (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Plaintiff UMG Recording, Inc . a Delaware corporation representedby John R. Bauer (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/28/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul D Clement (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daniel J. Cloherty (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Eve G. Burton (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew Oppenheim (See above for address) PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Timothy M. Reynolds (See above for address) PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Victoria L. Steinberg (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Joel Tenenbaum representedby Charles Nesson Harvard Law School 1525 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 617-495-4609 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew H. Feinberg Feinberg Kamholtz 1 South Market Bldg., 4th Fl Fanueil Hall Marketplace Boston, MA 02109 617-526-0700 Fax: 617-526-0701 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew A. Kamholtz Feinberg Kamholtz 1 South Market Bldg., 4th Fl Fanueil Hall Marketplace Boston, MA 02109-6175 617-526-0700 Fax: 617-526-0701 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Amicus The Nashville Songwriters Association International representedby The Nashville Songwriters Association International PRO SE Mary T. Sullivan Segal Roitman LLP 111 Devonshire Street 5th Floor Boston, MA 02109 617-742-0208 Fax: 617-742-2187 TERMINATED: 12/09/2011 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Amicus The Songwriters Guild of America representedby The Songwriters Guild of America PRO SE Mary T. Sullivan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/09/2011 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Amicus American Federation of Television and Radio Artists representedby American Federation of Television and Radio Artists PRO SE Mary T. Sullivan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/09/2011 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Amicus American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada representedby American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada PRO SE Mary T. Sullivan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/09/2011 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Amicus Motion Picture Association of America representedby Mark A. Walsh Duane Morris LLP Ste. 1000 505 9th Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-2166 202-776-7843 Fax: 202-776-7801 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Amicus The Berkman Center for Internet Society at Harvard Law School representedby Diane Cabell 1587 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 617-495-7547 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED John Palfrey 1587 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 617-495-7547 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Amicus Free Software Foundation representedby Theodore G. Fletcher Theodore G. Fletcher, Attorney at Law 311 Main St. P.O. Box 8 Southwest Harbor, ME 207-244-5225 Fax: 207-244-7175 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Date Filed # Docket Text 08/07/2007 1 COMPLAINT against Joel Tenenbaum, filed by Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Arista Records LLC, UMG Recording, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A to complaint# 2 Exhibit B-1 to the complaint# 3 Exhibit B-2 of the complaint# 4 Exhibit 3 to the complaint# 5 Exhibit B-4 to the complaint# 6 Exhibit B-5 to the complaint# 7 Exhibit B-6 to the complaint# 8 Exhibit B-7 to the complaint# 9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bauer, John) (Entered: 08/07/2007) 08/07/2007 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Arista Records LLC, UMG Recording, Inc.. (Bauer, John) (Entered: 08/07/2007) 08/07/2007 3 REPORT on the filing/termination of copyright case. (Bauer, John) (Entered: 08/07/2007) 08/07/2007 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nancy Gertner assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Collings (Nici, Richard) (Entered: 08/07/2007) 08/07/2007 Summons Issued as to Joel Tenenbaum. (Nici, Richard) (Entered: 08/07/2007) 08/13/2007 Filing fee: $ 350.00, receipt number 81705 for 1 Complaint, (Diskes, Sheila) (Entered: 08/13/2007) 09/05/2007 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Joel Tenenbaum.(Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 09/24/2007) 09/17/2007 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Joel Tenenbaum served on 8/18/2007, answer due 9/7/2007. (Bauer, John) (Entered: 09/17/2007) 09/26/2007 6 Judge Nancy Gertner : ORDER consolidating cases entered.(Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 09/26/2007) 09/26/2007 Civil Case Terminated. Case consolidated with 03cv11661NG. (Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 09/26/2007) 10/02/2008 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Eve G. Burton on behalf of Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Arista Records LLC, UMG Recording, Inc. (Burton, Eve) (Entered: 10/02/2008) 10/23/2008 8 STIPULATION TO JURY TRIAL by Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Arista Records LLC, UMG Recording, Inc., Joel Tenenbaum. (Burton, Eve) (Entered: 10/23/2008) 11/07/2008 9 MOTION to Strike Motion to Quash Subpoena Filed by Tova Tenenbaum by Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Arista Records LLC, UMG Recording, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: Plaintiffs' Subpoena to Tova Tenenbaum dated 10/16/08 (3pgs), # 2 Exhibit B: Tova Tenenbaum's Motion to Quash Subpoena dated 10/30/08 (6 pgs), # 3 Exhibit C: Tova Tenenbaum Deposition dated 10/15/08, Pages 1-2 and 78-81 (7 pgs total), # 4 Exhibit D: Arthur Tenenbaum Deposition dated 10/13/08 Pages 1-2 and 29 (3 pgs total))(Burton, Eve) (Entered: 11/07/2008) 05/05/2009 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered finding as moot 9 Motion to Strike. "DENIED as moot in light of the Court's 11/18/2008 Order on the Motion to Quash 685 and Motion to Strike 688 in the consolidated action, Case No. 03-11661." (Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 05/05/2009) 09/01/2009 13 MOTION for Entry of Judgment by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order) Originally filed in lead case 03cv11661NG.(Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 10/07/2009) 09/28/2009 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered: "Because of the number of cases and to facilitate judicial management, these cases will no longer be consolidated. All future filings should be filed in each defendants' respective case and no longer in the lead case." Associated Cases: 1:03-cv-11661-NG et al.(Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 09/28/2009) 09/28/2009 Case Reopened (Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 09/28/2009) 10/05/2009 10 First MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Joel Tenenbaum. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix opposition to motion for entry of judgment and injunction)(Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 10/05/2009) 10/05/2009 14 Opposition re 13 MOTION for Entry of Judgment filed by Joel Tenenbaum. (Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 10/07/2009) 10/06/2009 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Victoria L. Steinberg on behalf of Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Arista Records LLC, UMG Recording, Inc. (Steinberg, Victoria) (Entered: 10/06/2009) 10/06/2009 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J. Cloherty on behalf of Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Arista Records LLC, UMG Recording, Inc. (Cloherty, Daniel) (Entered: 10/06/2009) 10/07/2009 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew H. Feinberg on behalf of Joel Tenenbaum (Feinberg, Matthew) (Entered: 10/07/2009) 10/07/2009 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew A. Kamholtz on behalf of Joel Tenenbaum (Kamholtz, Matthew) (Entered: 10/07/2009) 10/16/2009 17 Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Judgment by Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Arista Records LLC, All Plaintiffs, UMG Recording, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Burton, Eve) (Entered: 10/16/2009) 11/23/2009 18 EXCERPT Transcript of Jury Trial Day Two (Opening Statements Only) held on July 28, 2009, before Judge Gertner. Court Reporter: Valerie A. O'Hara at 617/737-2346. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Redaction Request due 12/11/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/21/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/18/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 11/23/2009) 11/23/2009 19 EXCERPT Transcript of Jury Trial Day Four (Testimony of Ron Wilcox Only) held on July 30, 2009, before Judge Gertner. Court Reporter: Valerie A. O'Hata at 617/737-2346. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Redaction Request due 12/11/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/21/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/18/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 11/23/2009) 11/23/2009 20 EXCERPT Transcript of Jury Trial Day Four (Testimony of Joel Tenebaum Only) held on July 30, 2009, before Judge Gertner. Court Reporter: Valerie A. O'Hara at 617/737-2346. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Redaction Request due 12/11/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/21/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/18/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 11/23/2009) 11/23/2009 21 NOTICE is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above-captioned matter. Counsel are referred to the Court's Transcript Redaction Policy, a copy of which is attached to this entry.. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 11/23/2009) 12/07/2009 22 Judge Nancy Gertner: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 871 Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Defendant's Fair Use Defense in case 03cv11661NG entered.(Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 12/07/2009) 12/07/2009 23 Judge Nancy Gertner: MEMORANDUM entered granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Injunctive Relief and Entry of Judgment. (Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 12/07/2009) 12/07/2009 24 Judge Nancy Gertner: ORDER entered; JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendant.(Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 12/07/2009) 12/07/2009 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered; "With respect to post trial motions: if Defendant wishes to challenge any aspect of his trial, including the amount of statutory damages awarded by the jury, he may file a motion for new trial or remittitur by January 4, 2010. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(b). Plaintiffs will then have fourteen days from the date on which they are served with the motion to respond. See Local R. 7.1(b)(2)." (Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 12/07/2009) 12/07/2009 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered; "With respect to pending motions for sanctions 865 under Case No. 03-cv-11661NG and pending motion for costs and fees incurred by plaintiffs in filing a motion to compel (document #851), if the parties wish further briefing, they may do via contemporaneous briefs == by December 31, 2009." (Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 12/07/2009) 12/10/2009 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Diane Cabell returned because not here. (Gaudet, Jennifer) (Entered: 12/10/2009) 12/28/2009 25 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by John R. Bauer (Bauer, John) (Entered: 12/28/2009) 01/04/2010 26 MOTION for New Trial by Joel Tenenbaum.(Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 01/04/2010) 01/04/2010 27 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Joel Tenenbaum.(Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 01/04/2010) 01/15/2010 28 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to January 28, 2010 to File Response to Defendant's Motion for New Trial or Remittitur by All Plaintiffs.(Burton, Eve) (Entered: 01/15/2010) 01/15/2010 29 Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages in Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for New Trial or Remittitur by All Plaintiffs.(Burton, Eve) (Entered: 01/15/2010) 01/19/2010 30 Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by United States of America.(Bennett, Michelle) (Entered: 01/19/2010) 01/19/2010 31 RESPONSE to Motion re 26 MOTION for New Trial and Memorandum in Defense of the Constitutionality of the Statutory Damages Provision of the Copyright Act filed by United States of America. (Bennett, Michelle) (Entered: 01/19/2010) 01/20/2010 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered granting 27 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Hourihan, Lisa) (Entered: 01/20/2010) 01/20/2010 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered granting 28 Motion for Extension of Time to January 28, 2010 to File Response to Defendant's Motion for New Trial or Remittur (Hourihan, Lisa) (Entered: 01/20/2010) 01/20/2010 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered granting 29 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Hourihan, Lisa) (Entered: 01/20/2010) 01/20/2010 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered granting 30 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Gertner, Nancy) (Entered: 01/20/2010) 01/20/2010 32 Letter/request (non-motion) from Free Software Foundation. (Fletcher, Theodore) (Entered: 01/20/2010) 01/21/2010 Set/Reset Deadlines as to 26 MOTION for New Trial. Responses due by 1/28/2010 (Johnson, Jay) (Entered: 01/21/2010) 01/21/2010 33 RESPONSE to Motion re 26 MOTION for New Trial and Memorandum in Defense of the Constitutionality of the Statutory Damages Provision of the Copyright Act (Leave to file granted on 1/20/2010) filed by United States of America. (Bennett, Michelle) (Entered: 01/21/2010) 01/26/2010 34 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to February 8, 2010 to Respond to Defendant's Motion for New Trial or Remittitur (Unopposed) by All Plaintiffs.(Burton, Eve) (Entered: 01/26/2010) 01/28/2010 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered granting 34 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion for New Trial to 2/8/10 (Hourihan, Lisa) (Entered: 01/28/2010) 02/01/2010 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing on 26 MOTION for New Trial or Remittitur (Civ. Act. No. 07-cv-11446, document #26), and all pending motions, including, Plaintiffs' Motion for Costs and Fees Under Rule 37(a)(5) (Civ. Act. No. 03-cv-11661, document #851); Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defense Counsel to Cease Unauthorized Recording Activities, to Cease Publication of Discovery Materials and for Sanctions (Civ. Act. No. 03-cv-11661, document #865). Motion Hearing set for 2/16/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom 2 before Judge Nancy Gertner.(Molloy, Maryellen) (Entered: 02/01/2010) 02/04/2010 35 MOTION for Hearing Rescheduling by Joel Tenenbaum.(Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 02/04/2010) 02/08/2010 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered GRANTING 35 JOINT Motion to Continue Mtn Hearing....motion hearing reset from 2/16/10 to 2/23/10 at 3:15pm in ctrm #2, 3rd floor. Hearing will be held on MOTION for New Trial or Remittitur (Civ. Act. No. 07-cv-11446, document #26), and all pending motions. (Molloy, Maryellen) (Entered: 02/08/2010) 02/08/2010 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 26 MOTION for New Trial : Motion Hearing reset to 2/23/2010 03:15 PM in Courtroom 2 before Judge Nancy Gertner. (Molloy, Maryellen) (Entered: 02/08/2010) 02/08/2010 36 Opposition re 26 MOTION for New Trial or Remittitur filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-C, # 2 Exhibit D Part 1, # 3 Exhibit D Part 2, # 4 Exhibit D Part 3, # 5 Exhibit D Part 4, # 6 Exhibit D Part 5, # 7 Exhibit D Part 6, # 8 Exhibit D Part 7, # 9 Exhibit D Part 8, # 10 Exhibit D Part 9, # 11 Exhibit E, # 12 Exhibit F, # 13 Exhibit G, # 14 Exhibit H-O)(Burton, Eve) (Entered: 02/08/2010) 02/18/2010 37 First MOTION for Leave to File Reply by Joel Tenenbaum.(Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 02/18/2010) 02/18/2010 38 REPLY to Response to 26 MOTION for New Trial, 37 First MOTION for Leave to File Reply filed by Joel Tenenbaum. (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 02/18/2010) 02/18/2010 39 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs of Withdrawal of Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 865 in Civ. Act. No. 03-cv-11661-NG) (Burton, Eve) (Entered: 02/18/2010) 02/18/2010 Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered granting 37 Motion for Leave to File Reply; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Patch, Christine) (Entered: 02/18/2010) 02/18/2010 40 REPLY to Response to 26 MOTION for New Trial filed by Joel Tenenbaum. (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 02/18/2010) 02/23/2010 41 Judge Nancy Gertner: Joint Stipulated ORDER Regarding Motion for Sanctions entered. (Hourihan, Lisa) (Entered: 02/24/2010) 02/23/2010 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Nancy Gertner: Motion Hearing held on 2/23/2010 re 26 MOTION for New Trial filed by Joel Tenenbaum. All matters taken under advisement. (Court Reporter: O'Hara.)(Attorneys present: Atty Nesson, Oppenheim, Pariser, Reynolds) (Molloy, Maryellen) (Entered: 02/25/2010) 03/08/2010 42 Transcript of Hearing held on February 23, 2010, before Judge Gertner. Court Reporter: Valerie A. O'Hara at 617/737-2346. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Redaction Request due 3/29/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/8/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/7/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 03/08/2010) 03/08/2010 43 NOTICE is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above-captioned matter. Counsel are referred to the Court's Transcript Redaction Policy, a copy of which is attached to this entry.. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 03/08/2010) 03/08/2010 44 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs of Filing of Affidavit in Support of Expenses (see Doc. No. 851, Case No. 03-11661) and Request for Order Directing Payment (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Eve G. Burton)(Burton, Eve) (Entered: 03/08/2010) 03/22/2010 45 Notice of Supplemental Authorities re 26 MOTION for New Trial and in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition Thereto (Doc No. 36) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Reynolds, Timothy) (Entered: 03/22/2010) 03/26/2010 46 Judge Nancy Gertner: ORDER entered. The Court hereby ORDERS the defendant, Joel Tenenbaum, and his attorney, Charles Nesson, to pay plaintiffs Two Thousand Two Hundred Forty-Nine And 00/100 Dollars ($2,249.00) as reasonable expenses incurred in making the plaintiffs motion to compel. Both the defendant and his attorney shall be jointly and severally liable for making this payment to the plaintiffs.(GAM) (Entered: 03/26/2010) 07/09/2010 47 Judge Nancy Gertner: MEMORANDUM ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for New Trial (GAM) (Entered: 07/09/2010) 07/09/2010 48 Judge Nancy Gertner: AMENDED JUDGMENT, ENTERED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: Judgment is entered in favor plaintiffs and against defendants as follows: 1. Sony BMG Music Entertainment: Eleven Thousand Two Hundred Fifty And 00/100 Dollars ($11,250.00) for the five sound recordings; 2. Warner Bros. Records, Inc.,; Twenty-Two Thousand Five Hundred And 00/100 Dollars ($22,500.00) for the ten sound recordings; 3. Arista Records LLC; Four Thousand Five Hundred And 00/100 Dollars ($4,500.00) for the two sound recordings; and, 4. UMG Recordings, Inc.; Twenty-Nine Thousand Two Hundred Two Hundred Fifty And 00/100 Dollars ($29,250.00) for the thirteen sound recordings...(Boyce, Kathy) (Entered: 07/09/2010) 07/21/2010 49 US District Court Clerk to deliver official record to Court of Appeals by 8/10/2010. NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 48 Judgment,, by All Plaintiffs Filing fee: $ 455, receipt number 0101-2995085 Fee Status: N. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A Transcript Report/Order Form, which can be downloaded from the First Circuit Court of Appeals web site at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/clerks/transcript.htm MUST be completed and submitted to the Court of Appeals. Counsel shall register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf. Counsel shall also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/efiling.htm. (Reynolds, Timothy) (Entered: 07/21/2010) 07/21/2010 50 Certified and Transmitted Abbreviated Electronic Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re 49 Notice of Appeal, (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 07/21/2010) 07/21/2010 USCA Case Number 10-1883 for 49 Notice of Appeal, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 07/21/2010) 07/30/2010 51 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 48 Judgment,, by Joel Tenenbaum Filing fee: $ 455, receipt number 0101-3007070 Fee Status: n. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A Transcript Report/Order Form, which can be downloaded from the First Circuit Court of Appeals web site at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/clerks/transcript.htm MUST be completed and submitted to the Court of Appeals. Counsel shall register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf. Counsel shall also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/efiling.htm. US District Court Clerk to deliver official record to Court of Appeals by 8/19/2010. (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 07/30/2010) 08/10/2010 52 Certified and Transmitted Abbreviated Electronic Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re 51 Notice of Appeal, (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 08/10/2010) 08/10/2010 USCA Case Number 10-1947 for 51 Notice of Appeal, filed by Joel Tenenbaum. (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 08/10/2010) 08/11/2010 TRANSCRIPT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM received from USCA and addressed to Valerie OHara re 51 Notice of Appeal,,, Transcript order form filed in USCA on August 11, 2010. Transcript ordered: 2/8/05 Hearing (04-12434) and 7/27/09 - 7/30/09 Trial transcripts. Transcripts due by 10/12/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 08/12/2010) 08/26/2010 53 Transcript of Jury Trial Day One held on July 27, 2009, before Judge Nancy Gertner. COA Case No. 10-1883. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Valerie OHara at 617-737-2346 Redaction Request due 9/16/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/27/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/24/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 08/26/2010) 08/26/2010 54 REDACTED Transcript of Jury Trial Day Two held on July 28, 2009, before Judge Nancy Gertner. COA Case No. 10-1883. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Valerie OHara at 617-737-2346 Redaction Request due 9/16/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/27/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/24/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/13/2010: # 1 Redacted) (Scalfani, Deborah). Modified on 12/13/2010 (Scalfani, Deborah). (Entered: 08/26/2010) 08/26/2010 55 Transcript of Jury Trial Day Three held on July 29, 2009, before Judge Nancy Gertner. COA Case No. 10-1883. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Valerie OHara at 617-737-2346 Redaction Request due 9/16/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/27/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/24/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 08/26/2010) 08/26/2010 56 REDACTED Transcript of Jury Trial Day Four held on July 30, 2009, before Judge Nancy Gertner. COA Case No. 10-1883. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Valerie OHara at 617-737-2346 Redaction Request due 9/16/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/27/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/24/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/13/2010: # 1 Redacted) (Scalfani, Deborah). Modified on 12/13/2010 (Scalfani, Deborah). (Entered: 08/26/2010) 08/26/2010 57 Transcript of Jury Trial Day Five held on July 31, 2009, before Judge Nancy Gertner. COA Case No. 10-1883. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Valerie OHara at 617-737-2346 Redaction Request due 9/16/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/27/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/24/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 08/26/2010) 08/26/2010 58 Transcript of Hearing in associated case #04-12434-NG held on February 2, 2006, before Judge Nancy Gertner. COA Case No. 10-1883. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Valerie OHara at 617-737-2346 Redaction Request due 9/16/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/27/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/24/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 08/26/2010) 08/26/2010 59 NOTICE is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above-captioned matter. Counsel are referred to the Court's Transcript Redaction Policy, a copy of which is attached to this entry.. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 08/26/2010) 09/03/2010 60 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 48 Judgment,, by United States of America Fee Status: US Government. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A Transcript Report/Order Form, which can be downloaded from the First Circuit Court of Appeals web site at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/clerks/transcript.htm MUST be completed and submitted to the Court of Appeals. Counsel shall register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf. Counsel shall also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/efiling.htm. US District Court Clerk to deliver official record to Court of Appeals by 9/23/2010. (Risner, Scott) (Entered: 09/03/2010) 09/03/2010 61 Certified and Transmitted Abbreviated Electronic Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re 60 Notice of Appeal, (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 09/03/2010) 09/07/2010 USCA Case Number 10-2052 for 60 Notice of Appeal, filed by United States of America. (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 09/07/2010) 09/07/2010 62 NOTICE of Intent to Request Redaction by Timothy M. Reynolds re 56 Transcript - Appeal, 54 Transcript - Appeal, (Reynolds, Timothy) (Entered: 09/07/2010) 09/17/2010 63 Transcript Redaction Request re 56 Transcript - Appeal, 54 Transcript - Appeal, by attorney Timothy M. Reynolds. (Reynolds, Timothy) (Entered: 09/17/2010) 09/19/2011 64 OPINION of USCA as to 60 Notice of Appeal, filed by United States of America, 49 Notice of Appeal, filed by All Plaintiffs, 51 Notice of Appeal, filed by Joel Tenenbaum. Opinion issued in the USCA 9/16/2011 (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 09/19/2011) 09/19/2011 65 USCA Judgment as to 60 Notice of Appeal, filed by United States of America, 49 Notice of Appeal, filed by All Plaintiffs, 51 Notice of Appeal, filed by Joel Tenenbaum. This cause came on to be heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and was argued by counsel. Upon consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows: The district court's finding of liability against defendant Joel Tenenbaum and in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed. The district court entry of injunctive relief is affirmed. The district court's due process damages ruling is vacated, and the district court's reduction of the jury's statutory damages award is reversed. The jury's award of damages is reinstated. The matter is remanded to the district court for consideration of plaintiff's motion for common law remittitur based on excessiveness and for further proceedings consistent with the opinion issued this day. Costs are awarded to plaintiff's. Judgment issued in the USCA 9/16/2011 (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 09/19/2011) 11/30/2011 66 MANDATE of USCA as to 60 Notice of Appeal, filed by United States of America, 49 Notice of Appeal, filed by All Plaintiffs, 51 Notice of Appeal, filed by Joel Tenenbaum. Appeal 60 , 49 , 51 Terminated (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 11/30/2011) 11/30/2011 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Rya W. Zobel added. Judge Nancy Gertner no longer assigned to case. (Farrell, Robert) (Entered: 11/30/2011) 11/30/2011 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing. Status Conference set for 12/13/2011 02:45 PM in Courtroom 12 before Judge Rya W. Zobel. (Urso, Lisa) (Entered: 11/30/2011) 12/01/2011 Case Reopened per 66 (Duong, Diep) (Entered: 12/01/2011) 12/08/2011 67 MOTION to appear at the December 13, 2011 status conference by telephone by United States of America.(Bennett, Michelle) (Entered: 12/08/2011) 12/08/2011 68 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by Mary T. Sullivan (Sullivan, Mary) (Entered: 12/08/2011) 12/09/2011 Judge Rya W. Zobel: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 67 Motion to participate by phone (Urso, Lisa) (Entered: 12/09/2011) 12/12/2011 Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 12/13/2011 02:30 PM in Courtroom 12 before Judge Rya W. Zobel. (Time change only) (Urso, Lisa) (Entered: 12/12/2011) 12/13/2011 69 Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Paul D. Clement Filing fee: $ 50, receipt number 0101-3714120 by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Cloherty, Daniel) (Entered: 12/13/2011) 12/13/2011 ELECTRONIC Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Rya W. Zobel: Status Conference held on 12/13/2011; defendants memo 1/3/12; plaintiff's and Goverment's memo 1/27/12; reply 2/6/12; Memo 30 pages; and reply 5 pages; Hearing set for 2/22/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 12 before Judge Rya W. Zobel.). (Court Reporter: No Court Reporter Used.)(Attorneys present: various) (Urso, Lisa) (Entered: 12/13/2011) 12/14/2011 Judge Rya W. Zobel: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 69 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Paul D. Clement. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Johnson, Jay) (Entered: 12/14/2011) 01/03/2012 70 BRIEF by Joel Tenenbaum Defendant's Opening Brief on Remand . (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 01/03/2012) 01/27/2012 71 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Risner, Scott) (Entered: 01/27/2012) 01/27/2012 72 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by All Plaintiffs. (Clement, Paul) (Entered: 01/27/2012) 02/06/2012 73 Defendant's Reply Brief to Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities Response by Joel Tenenbaum to 72 Memorandum of Law . (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 02/06/2012) 02/06/2012 74 Defendant's Reply Brief to Intervenor United States' Memorandum on Remand Response by Joel Tenenbaum to 71 Memorandum of Law . (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 02/06/2012) 02/13/2012 75 MOTION to Strike , or in the Alternative, to Disregard Defendant's Reply Briefs by All Plaintiffs.(Cloherty, Daniel) (Entered: 02/13/2012) 02/16/2012 76 First RESPONSE to Motion re 75 MOTION to Strike , or in the Alternative, to Disregard Defendant's Reply Briefs filed by Joel Tenenbaum. (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 02/16/2012) 02/22/2012 ELECTRONIC Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Rya W. Zobel: Hearing held on 2/22/2012. Judge hears counsel and takes matter under advisement; (Court Reporter: Catherine Handel at 617-261-0555.)(Attorneys present: various) (Urso, Lisa) (Entered: 02/24/2012) 02/27/2012 77 Letter/request (non-motion) from Charles Nesson, Counsel for Joel Tenenbaum . (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 02/27/2012) 03/02/2012 78 Letter/request (non-motion) from Plaintiffs' counsel . (Cloherty, Daniel) (Entered: 03/02/2012) 06/05/2012 79 MOTION Further Submission by Joel Tenenbaum.(Feinberg, Matthew) (Entered: 06/05/2012) 06/05/2012 80 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Joel Tenenbaum. Amended Further Submission re Document No. 79 . (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 06/05/2012) 07/06/2012 81 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Amended Further Submission by All Plaintiffs.(Cloherty, Daniel) (Entered: 07/06/2012) 08/23/2012 82 Judge Rya W. Zobel: ORDER entered granting 75 Motion to Strike ; granting 81 Motion to Strike (Urso, Lisa) (Entered: 08/23/2012) 09/17/2012 83 NOTICE OF APPEAL of ORDER entered granting 75 Motion to Strike ; granting 81 Motion to Strike by Joel Tenenbaum Filing fee: $ 455, receipt number 0101-4117524 Fee Status: Not Exempt. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A Transcript Report/Order Form, which can be downloaded from the First Circuit Court of Appeals web site at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov MUST be completed and submitted to the Court of Appeals. Counsel shall register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf . Counsel shall also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/efiling.htm . US District Court Clerk to deliver official record to Court of Appeals by 10/9/2012. (Nesson, Charles) Modified on 9/18/2012 (Johnson, Jay). (Entered: 09/17/2012) 09/19/2012 84 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE pursuant to LR 5.2 by Joel Tenenbaum re 83 Notice of Appeal,,, . (Nesson, Charles) (Entered: 09/19/2012) 09/24/2012 85 Certified and Transmitted Abbreviated Electronic Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re 83 Notice of Appeal, (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 09/24/2012) 09/24/2012 86 USCA Case Number 12-2146 for 83 Notice of Appeal, filed by Joel Tenenbaum. (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 09/24/2012) 06/25/2013 87 OPINION of USCA as to 83 Notice of Appeal filed by Joel Tenenbaum. AFFIRMED... (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 06/26/2013) 06/25/2013 88 USCA Judgment as to 83 Notice of Appeal filed by Joel Tenenbaum. AFFIRMED... (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 06/26/2013) 09/03/2013 89 MANDATE of USCA as to 83 Notice of Appeal,,, filed by Joel Tenenbaum. Appeal 83 Terminated (Danieli, Chris) (Entered: 09/04/2013)
个人分类: 法律|10359 次阅读|3 个评论
分享 网教:什么叫诽谤?-- 杨、HAN实例
热度 1 岳东晓 2015-8-3 03:59
什么叫诽谤?就是用虚假的事实来诋毁他人。因此,诽谤尤其是恶意诽谤往往也是一个诚信问题。杨文彬与GAOGAO HAN两人的恶意诽谤就是如此。 以杨文彬为例,他清楚地知道事实,因为我都已经跟他说了事实如何,他自己也能去查,但他却通过撒谎来攻击本人,这跟他把书上抄来的东西当成自己的伟大发明其实是同一模式---都是不诚实。 GAOGAO HAN则是不断说他一行代码解决了我一大堆代码的问题,借此谎言来贬低、否定、攻击本人的信誉与职业水平。 其实,你老实做人不好吗?我是专业的技术工作者,在相关行业摸爬滚打20年,开发的产品被多少公司用于 mission critical application, 我比一个菜鸟水平高是天经地义的事情--否则我凭什么让人家公司交钱--网上免费软件多的是,没有哪个菜鸟会因为水平比我低就会丢面子。结果他要通过谎言来诋毁你、骑在你头上。这就是做人不老实。 从这个角度,杨、HAN两人不如炎黄之子,他韩老先生卖壮阳药、吃救济都坦白地承认了,承认这个其实是需要勇气的。 文末是起诉书中关于HAN的蓄意侵权、诽谤与不公平竞争的部分内容。 大致陈述如下。翰山早在2012年6月就是珍珠湾注册会员,并且使用 Tube.JS 软件,对其功能也熟悉。2012年7月31日,原告写了一篇介绍珍珠湾新功能的博文,并明确指出原告拥有相关知识产权,并已经申请法律保护。当时,翰山在该文下面献了花。2014年10月4日,翰山宣称微博可以张贴图像。经查,发现其网页出现” "Copyright(c) All Rights Reserved, Infringement Will Be Prosecuted"这一 Tube.JS 版权警告信息。进一步检查发现,翰山网把原告代码藏在另一个文件。 2014年10月9日,翰山宣布可以在翰山网任意一处包括微博、博客、论坛、相册、留言板、私信等张贴图片链接并显示,网友称赞而不知翰山代码源于窃取。。。被指出侵权后,翰山不断重复他一行代码解决所有问题,原告水平太低、娃娃程度,说话水分,版权可笑,等等 ... 实际上,直到2015年6月28日,翰山仍然没有解决论坛插入多媒体的问题,而这一初级功能早在2012年7月就存在于原告的软件,而且原告软件的这一功能翰山在2014年10月9日就注意到了并加以吹嘘。 另外,翰山注册 hanshan.co 的联系人信息的邮政编码不存在、地址也查不到。各位须知,用虚假信息注册域名并进行侵权是可能被加重惩罚的。我将试图核实相关联系人信息的真实性,到时再公布。 On October 11, 2014, Han posted a blog article which stated in part: "As I stated much earlier, this software was very simple, only at children 's level... Today, in order to remove code, but to keep image and video working, I wrote two lines of code in the backend, and solved the problem of image and video in micro-blog... So, you know, how ridiculous the so-called copyrighted code by Yue Dongxiao was. His large pile of code did about four things: inserting images, video, audio and voice recording. By my estimation, it was just a problem solvable with four lines of code." Han emphasized the words "two lines" with red color. On the same day, in the comment area of the blog article, Han posted a screenshot of a statement by Plaintiff that Plaintiff personally wrote the code for inserting images, video, audio, voice recording, blog synchronization, multiple micro-blogs and other features for ZZB. Han then commented on Plaintiff's statement: "His level is too limited. This is just a matter of a few lines of code. Yet he sounds as if he wants to apply for the Nobel Prize. It is clear how much water there is when he talks." Some people on HANSHAN believed Han's false statements and posted messages attacking Plaintiff. On November 1, 2014, Defendant Han posted a message stating: "Spent the whole day today on technology. In fact, the technology was very simple, to accomplish posting images, posting audio and video with one key, was just one line of code, used repeatedly, only in different combinations. This is essentially the main content of Yue Dongxiao's patent. Saying this, let's count it as defaming him!" O n November 2, 2014, in a blog article, ... Han wrote: "What is one line? All those have programmed know, a line is separated by semicolon (;)... Had Yue Dongxiao known that one line of code could solve these many problems, he wouldn't have written a large pile of code and applied for patent protection." On November 3, 2014, Defendant Han posted another blog article, in which he stated, in part: "Why did I use Yue Dongxiao's code? ... his code was indeed good to use. I used his code to display images in micro-blog, it was just grabbing and using (of course, there were some preparation work); to display video and audio, I only changed three parameters, just to substitute what I liked (example: icons)... Then later, to replace his program to achieve those functions such as pasting images, I wrote one line of code in the backend. In comparison, isn't writing one line of code less easier than not writing one line of code? So, I used his code.” On January 28, 2015, Defendant Han wrote a blog article about the monetary value of HANSHAN website. Defendant Han hinted that $25,000.00 was too little for it, and HANSHAN's core technology is invaluable. Defendant Han further stated that without his teaching, Plaintiff would not have known the core technology of HANSHAN. Defendant Han published numerous times the false statements that the functions of Plaintiff's code can be achieved with one line or four lines of code, on HANSHAN websites and elsewhere on the internet. Defendant Han published the false statements in a stated effort to defame Plaintiff and injure Plaintiff reputation as a professional software developer. In fact, by June 28, 2015, HANSHAN still lacked the capability of inserting video and audio into its forum area, a basic feature that was included in Tube.JS since July 2012, and a feature noticed and exalted by Han on October 9, 2014, when HANSHAN was operating with the stolen Tube.JS code. Plaintiff's Tube.JS program is a piece of high quality software providing many useful and reliable features. Defendants' code was at most a crude attempt to imitate a subset of features long existed in Tube.JS. On information and belief, Defendants' code merely consisted of rudimentary regular expression substitutions. As alleged above, Defendants had failed to achieve the basic functionality of Tube.JS after months of development. Defendants' false representations about the nature, characteristics and qualities of Tube.JS and their own code constitute false advertisement and unfair competition against Plaintiff, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
5584 次阅读|3 个评论
分享 美国石油梦还是联邦监狱
热度 2 岳东晓 2015-7-11 13:20
刚在网上看到一条新闻,称一家称为LUCA能源的公司被SEC起诉。在网上一搜,出现这条新闻:《 川妹子的美国石油梦——访路凯国际能源集团总裁杨冰清 》,里面写道:【 弱女子想要在男人天下的石油行业立足,必须强势。拿句杨冰清家乡的四川话:必须“雄起”!】 再查查 SEC LUCA,找到了 SEC起诉 杨冰清的起诉书 ,内中提到,此人骗取投资者 6800 万美元,将数百万美元转到自己私人账户上,在 Fremont,CA 购买价值240万的个人房产之类,又用投资人的钱给家人亲戚使用。大量投资不知去向。起诉书还提到,当 SEC 对杨提问时,杨 take the fifth 拒绝回答问题。 所谓 take the fifth,就是启用美国宪法第五修正案中不被强迫认罪的权利。这项权利在民事案中也可以调用,但是在联邦民事案件中,take the fifth 将被作为不利推断(adverse inference)的证据。简单的说,你说怕被定罪不回答问题,这就说明你确实有鬼。须知,民事案的证明一般只需要 "preponderance of evidence" ,也就是可能性大于不可能性即可(用算术术语,可能性大于50%)。。。民事起诉成立, DOJ 联邦检察官可能就在后面跟着。 2013年 Fremont 的 Albert Ke-Jeng Hu 被美 联邦法院判处12年有期徒刑 。此人是 MIT 机械系 1992 年的Ph.D. , 论文链接在此 。据被他欺骗的人们说,他非常能说会道,每次见顾客都是拿出漂亮的曲线与报表,显示其投资增长相当不错。当然,后来知道,这些都是假的。当投资人产生怀疑去追问的时候,他逃到香港,后来被香港政府引渡回美国受审。认识他的人说他太聪明,FBI 都拿他没招。不过,从联邦法院的判决看来,他的欺诈事业规模只有几百万美元,简直是一个 micro-麦道夫。 麦道夫因为骗取几百亿判150年徒刑,据说在监狱中跟囚友 PK 股票知识,劝说囚友们 根据 SP 500 diversify 之类,甚至 争论之中被监狱的难友--一名柔道黑带---打断鼻梁 。然而,贪欲这个东西是很难被威慑住的,还会有人前仆后继。
个人分类: 法律|6388 次阅读|1 个评论
分享 桑兰案进展:被告称诬告
热度 3 岳东晓 2014-9-10 12:00
刚才听传新华社报道了桑兰案的进展,我下载了被告律师给桑兰律师的一封警告信,在信中,被告律师称桑兰没有证据支持其控告,必须立刻撤诉。 特别令人惊奇的是,桑兰指控被告诽谤一条非常具体,但现在莫虎称桑兰拿不出证据。在起诉书中,桑兰称被告在网上发表了(从英文翻译)“桑兰太懒,找不到工作“, ”桑兰太懒,可以自己小便,却不这么做..."等法官认为可能构成诽谤的言辞,如果说这些是桑兰编造,确实难以想象。但莫虎在给桑兰律师的信中写道 【我们已经不是在诉讼初期,取证阶段已经结束,而原告没有出示一份博客或者文件显示含有这些被指为诽谤的言论...】 莫虎结论,原告或者没有证据,或者指控是完全捏造。 莫虎的结论从法律角度看似乎过于草率。证明被告诽谤并不一定需要文件证据。完全可能发生被告发表了诽谤性内容并有很多人看到,但事后被告做了删除处理,而原告没有存档的情况。在这种情况下,如果有人证明看到过被告发表这样的文字,也完全构成证据。证人在哪?别的不说,海明应该就是证人。这个指控是他提出的,当时他正在网上为桑兰案混战,应该是看到了什么。另外,诽谤并不需要说得很明白,只要意思影射就可能构成毁谤。 莫虎给桑兰律师信参见链接: sang-lan-192.pdf
个人分类: 法律|9390 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 薄案:25日庭审记录
热度 1 新闻速递 2013-8-25 14:18
【庭审现场】   审判长:现在继续开庭。带被告人薄熙来到庭。   审判长:下面对昨天证人王立军发布的证人证言质证,首先由公诉人发表质证意见。   公诉人:公诉人认为王立军陈述的2012年1月28日晚,明确告诉薄熙来薄谷开来杀人,1月29日被薄熙来打骂,薄熙来明确表达了拒不接受薄谷开来杀人的态度,知道王智、王鹏飞被吴某某审查,及违法免去王立军公安局长职务的事实,与起诉书指控的薄熙来滥用职权犯罪具有关联性,且有其他证据予以印证,可以作为定案证据予以采信,质证意见发表到此。   审判长:被告人薄熙来对证人证言有什么意见?   被告人:王立军作证过程中不断地明显撒谎,他的证言完全不足以采信,他的证言充满了欺骗,而且是信口开河。比如关于光盘的事情,他昨天讲的和他自己的笔录证词中就显然矛盾,他自己听力极佳,能够隔着一个房间关着门,在另一个房间里的事都他都能听到。他说的很多事情都是单证。他说我不是一耳光,而是一拳,而我没有练过拳术,而且也没有这么大的打击力。   审判长:被告人的意思是昨天证人王立军发表的相关证言是不真实的?   被告人:对,是不真实的。   审判长:被告人的意见本庭已听清,庭后我们合议庭在综合评议相关证据的时候会予以充分的注意。   被告人:行。法院已经认定他形成滥用职权罪和叛逃罪,特别是叛逃引起了极其恶劣的影响,昨天他狡辩他不是叛逃,而是正常的外交,有手续。   审判长:对于已经经过生效判决认定的事实,在法庭上不需要再讨论,这都是公之于众的判决。   被告人:综上,此人品质极其恶劣,一是当场造谣,二是把水搅混,这种人作为重要证人进行举证,有失法律公信力。   审判长:本庭提醒被告人,通知王立军到庭作证是根据公诉机关和被告人双方的申请作出的决定。   被告人:谢谢。   审判长:辩护人有什么意见?   辩护人:证人王立军与被告人之间存在重大利益冲突,因为打过他耳光、免过他的职。在这种情况下,他的证言真实性和客观性值得怀疑。他一出庭就对被告人表现出极大敌意,说他不是证人,是被告人的被害人。辩护人认真听取了证人的回答,对照他以前的在侦查阶段作为证人的证言笔录,以及其他相关的证言,说谎的地方多。   辩护人:他说了谷开来给他讲了杀人,他不相信谷开来杀人,所以他没有对谷开来杀人这个事儿进行立案侦查,同时他又坚持他给被告人汇报了,被告人却打了他耳光。一方面他说他自己不相信,同时又说你被告人在相信。他讲谷开来经常撒谎,动不动就说要干大事,她还经常报假案。1月28日晚上,王立军到底是去汇报?是向被告人去汇报还是另有目的另有动机?辩护人看来他不是汇报而是去要挟被告人,因为要说汇报,他不应该向被告人汇报。如果他深信谷开来杀人了,不要忘了被告人是谷开来的丈夫,是他的亲属,你知道一个犯罪嫌疑人杀人了,你居然向他的丈夫向他的妻子去汇报,这是违反相关的回避规则的,这是不可以的。他一方面讲这事他一直扛着,另一方面讲让他站着死他不能跪着死,是在表忠心,同时又告诉你这事儿很大,言外之意是要挟,根本不是汇报。因为他汇报挨了打,这根本站不住脚。   审判长:请公诉人就该项指控犯罪事实继续举证。   公诉人:审判长,公诉人继续向法庭出示证实被告人薄熙来违反规定,滥用职权犯罪事实的证据。   公诉人向法庭出示证人证言:   1、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市人民政府副市长、市公安局党委书记、局长王立军的证言。王立军证言证实以下3个事实:   (l)2012年1月28日晚上,告诉被告人薄熙来薄谷开来杀人之后,1月29日被薄熙来打骂,薄熙来表明严禁重新调查11.15案件的态度。当日,王立军要求王智、王鹏飞等人重新整理11.15案件卷宗材料,安排人给薄熙来送去王智、王鹏飞、郭维国的辞职信。   (2)吴某某对以辞职信为名举报薄谷开来杀人的11.15案件办案人王智、王鹏飞进行审查。   (3)自己被薄熙来违规免去公安局党委书记、局长职务,解释自己叛逃美国驻成都总领事馆的原因。   2、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市公安局副局长郭维国的证言,证实:按照王立军的要求,主持11.15案件的现场勘查。1月29日薄熙来斥责、打骂王立军,表明严禁重新调查“11.15案件”的态度。当日,王立军要求重新整理11.15案件相关材料、物证。   3、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市委副秘书长兼办公厅主任吴某某的证言,证实以下4个事实:   (l)2012年1月29日上午薄熙来斥责、打骂王立军,表明严禁重新调查“11.15案件”态度。   (2)1月29日晚上,去薄熙来家送王智、王鹏飞等人的辞职信,告诉薄熙来、薄谷开来,王智、王鹏飞的辞职信就是举报薄谷开来杀人的举报信。自己作为办公厅主任无权对公安机关办案人员进行谈话、审查,但按照薄熙来要求审查了王智、王鹏飞,并将审查结果向薄熙来汇报。   (3)2012年1月30日就听薄谷开来说要免去王立军公安局长职务,1月31日,薄熙来让他重新制作调整王立军副市长分工表。   (4)薄谷开来参与了2012年2月7日凌晨对王立军出走事件的研究,会后薄谷开来与大坪医院领导协调出具王立军虚假诊断证明并交其具体办理。   4、公诉人向法庭出示证人被告人薄熙来妻子薄谷开来的证言,证实以下4个事实:   (1)薄熙来告知薄谷开来王立军说她杀人后,薄谷开来告诉薄熙来王立军在诬陷。2012年1月29日中午,薄熙来告诉薄谷开来,自己打了王立军一个耳光,说是他这辈子第一次打人。后来,吴某某也告诉自己,薄熙来让吴某某和郭维国在场,大骂王立军,对王立军说,你告吧,你去告吧,怎么不连我也告啊,越说越急,扇了王立军一个耳光,王立军嘴角被打出了血,薄熙来还气得摔了杯子。   (2)2012年1月29日,吴某某向她和薄熙来汇报王鹏飞、王智的辞职信就是举报她杀人的举报信。她当即提出由吴某某“查查王鹏飞、王智”,薄熙来表示同意。2012年2月2日、2月15日她两次书面要求关某某以诬告陷害罪审查王鹏飞。2月15日再次找了关某某之后,王鹏飞被以涉嫌诬告陷害罪立案侦查。   (3)2月7日凌晨王某汇报王立军事件,参与听取汇报,提出可以说是王立军精神健康方面的原因导致他出走,并提出让大坪医院出具王立军诊断证明,薄熙来未要求其回避。薄熙来同意她的想法。当天中午,薄谷开来找来朱某某、蒋某某、吴某某,由医院出具王立军存在严重抑郁状态的诊断证明。   5、公诉人向法庭出示证人重庆新桥医院眼科主任孙某某、重庆新桥医院耳鼻喉科主任杨某的证言,均证实:2012年1月29日下午,二人到王立军办公室对王立军进行诊治,王立军自述上午在处理事情过程中与人发生摩擦,左耳部受到外力击打,有耳鸣、耳痛症状。杨某为王立军检查后诊断结论为针尖状鼓膜穿孔。   6、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市公安局副局长王某某、证人时任重庆市公安局交巡警总队副政委李某某、王立军秘书罗某、薄熙来秘书车某的证言,证实:王某某按照王立军的要求,安排李某某给吴某某送王智、王鹏飞、郭维国辞职信。李某某按照王某某的要求,将王智交给自己的三封辞职信交给罗某。罗某按照吴某某的要求,将辞职信交给车某,车某交给吴某某。   7、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市公安局沙坪坝区分局常务副局长王智证言,证实薄熙来打了王立军之后,按照王立军的要求与王鹏飞一起写辞职报告,重新整理11.15案件卷宗和证据。王立军被免职后,吴某某找他和王鹏飞谈话,吴某某没有权力找他和王鹏飞谈话,但迫于压力,他写了一份与事实相反的情况报告,给薄谷开来写了悔过书。   8、公诉人向法庭出示证人、时任重庆市渝北区人民政府副区长、市公安局渝北区分局局长王鹏飞证言,证实:按照王立军的要求写辞职信举报薄谷开来杀人,重新整理11.15案件卷宗和证据。吴某某找他谈话,对他进行审查。他未按照吴某某的要求写悔过书。后被禁闭7天。解除禁闭后,又被看护至3月28日的事实。   9、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市公安局党委书记关某某的证言,证实以下4个事实:   (l)2012年2月2日参与吴某某对王智、王鹏飞的谈话、审查;   (2)2012年2月15日,按照薄熙来的要求,对王鹏飞进行审查,并对王鹏飞刑事立案;   (3)2012年2月17日,经薄熙来的提议和批准,王鹏飞被取消渝北区副区长候选人资格;   (4)2月1日晚知道自己任公安局党委书记。任职之后,薄熙来没有安排对11.15案件进行复查,谈到的就是王鹏飞、王智等人的诬告陷害。   10、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市公安局副局长王某某,证实听关某某说是薄熙来要求查办王鹏飞,以及王鹏飞被审查的经过。   11、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市公安局纪委副书记王某某、时任重庆市公安局督察总队一支队副支队长吴某某、时任市公安局督察总队六支队干警王某某的证言,证实王某某与关某某、王某某商量确定由渝中区分局对王鹏飞以涉嫌诬告陷害立案后安排吴某某、王某某等人对王鹏飞进行审查的事实。王某某还证实,对王鹏飞以涉嫌诬告陷害罪立案之后,将立案通知书送达薄谷开来。把王鹏飞写的检讨书交给吴某某。   12、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市委常委、组织部部长陈某某,2013年8月6日在审查起诉阶段证言,证实以下2个事实:   (1)薄熙来明知任免公安局长需事先征得公安部同意。在免去王立军公安局党委书记、局长职务过程中,自己又多次提醒薄熙来必须报公安部,走完程序,才能提交常委会研究。但是薄熙来坚持不报告公安部,先研究任免。常委会后,薄熙来要求第二天到公安局宣布市委的任免决定。在陈某某再次提醒薄熙来   没有经公安部同意,市委就不能出正式任免文件的情况下,薄熙来仍要求第二天宣布市委决定。   (2)2012年2月17日,薄熙来电话通知陈某某,王鹏飞涉嫌违法违纪,公安局对他立案了,要查他,不能再提名作为副区长人选。当日,按照薄熙来的提议和批准,王鹏飞被取消渝北区副区长候选人资格。   13、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市委组织部副部长杜某某、重庆市渝北区委书记周某证言,证实取消王鹏飞渝北区副区长提名人选过程。   14、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市委常委、政法委书记刘某某,时任重庆市委常委、市长黄某某,时任重庆市委秘书长翁某某,时任被告人薄熙来秘书车某证言,证实王立军被免职前,2012年1月29日、30日、31日,薄熙来让车某分别通知重庆市市长黄某某、重庆市人大主任兼组织部长陈某某、重庆市委副书记张某、重庆市纪委书记徐某某、重庆市政法委书记刘某某谈话。并经薄熙来提议,在未取得公安部同意的情况下,免去王立军公安局党委书记、局长职务。刘某某证实,薄熙来找其谈话时,提醒薄熙来要注意相关程序。   15、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市委组织部副部长胡某证言及出具的情况说明、时任重庆市委组织部干部二处处长周某某、时任重庆市委组织部部务委员李某某证言,证实:未经公安部同意,免去王立军公安局党委书记、局长职务,在市委未制作正式任免文件的情况下,即宣布该决定。   16、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市国家安全局局长王某证言,证实:2012年2月7日凌晨向薄熙来汇报王立军叛逃美国驻成都总领事馆的情况时,薄谷开来参与听取汇报,并第一个提出王立军有精神疾病,还提出让大坪医院出证明,薄熙来同意。   17、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市委常委、市委秘书长翁某某证言、工作记录,证实以下2个事实:   (1)2月7日凌晨与王某等人向薄熙来汇报王立军进入美领馆一事。薄谷开来参加听取汇报,并最早提出王立军有精神病的意见。薄熙来没有让薄谷开来回避。薄谷开来提出王立军有精神病后,应薄熙来的要求拿到大坪医院的证明,并交给其秘书。   (2)2012年2月8日上午,经被告人薄熙来同意,发布“王立军正在接受休假式治疗”的虚假微博。   18、公诉人向法庭出示证人大坪医院神经内科副主任蒋某某、重庆市大坪医院副院长朱某某、大坪医院院长周某证言,证实:2012年2月7日,蒋某某、朱某某根据薄谷开来的要求出具了虚假的《王立军病情诊断证明书》,并将诊断证明书的复印件交翁某某的秘书。按照薄谷开来的要求,后补了内容虚假的2012年1月15日、2月10日对王立军病情的讨论记录及病史小结、病情介绍(部分)。   19、公诉人向法庭出示证人翁某某秘书尹某某于2012年10月19日在侦查阶段的证言,证实:按照翁某某的安排,自蒋某某处拿到王立军诊断证明,后交给检察机关。   20、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市委宣传部副部长、市政府新闻办主任周某,时任重庆市委宣传部互联网新闻研究中心主任吴某某,时任重庆市委宣传部新闻发布处处长马某某,时任薄熙来秘书车某的证言证实,2012年2月8日,翁某某向周某传达薄熙来关于王立军有病是根据大坪医院提供的病情证实,近期确有严重的抑郁症,之前提出要休假进行治疗等指示后,周某、吴某某、马某某草拟“王立军副市长因长期超负荷工作,精神高度紧张,身体严重不适,经同意,现正在接受休假式的治疗”的过程,翁某某经上报薄熙来同意后,于当日10时54分通过重庆市政府官方微博予以发布。   公诉人向法庭出示第二组证据,书证。   1、公诉人向法庭出示四川省成都市中级人民法院(2012)成刑初字第38号王立军刑事判决书,证实以下内容:   (1)该判决书确认的北京市公安局(2012)4号《立案决定书》、重庆刑警总队的《情况说明》证实:北京市公安局于2012年3月14日对尼尔伍德被害案立案。之前,重庆市公安机关未立案侦查。判决还认定,2012年1月29日之后,王立军要求重庆市公安局有关人员对薄谷开来涉嫌故意杀人案重新建档案,调查补证,保留物证。   (2)该判决认定,2012年1月底,王立军向当时的重庆市委主要负责人反映了薄谷开来涉嫌杀人一事,但被认为诬陷并遭到怒斥。2012年2月初,王立军因其公安局局长职务被宣布调整,身边另外三名工作人员又被非法审查,感到处境危险。2月6日,王立军以洽谈工作为由,于当日14时31分私自进入美领馆,与美领馆官员就环境保护等事项作了短暂交谈后,即称因查办案件人身安全受到威胁,请求美方提供庇护,并提出政治避难申请。经我有关方面劝导,王立军于2月7日23时35分自动离开美领馆。王立军的行为在国内外造成了恶劣影响。   2、公诉人向法庭出示安徽省合肥市中级人民法院(2012)合刑初字第00082号薄谷开来刑事判决书,证实:2012年8月19日薄谷开来因犯故意杀人罪,被安徽省合肥市中级人民法院判处死刑,缓期二年执行,剥夺政治权利终身。   3、公诉人向法庭出示安徽省合肥市中级人民法院(2012)合刑初字第00083号郭维国、李阳、王鹏飞、王智刑事判决书,证实:郭维国、李阳、王鹏飞、王智是薄谷开来、张晓军故意杀人案的办案人,因在办理该案中拘私枉法,2012年8月19日被安徽省合肥市中级人民法院以拘私枉法罪,判处郭维国有期徒刑十一年,李阳有期徒刑七年,王鹏飞、王智有期徒刑五年。   4、公诉人向法庭出示经王鹏飞、王智确认的二人辞职信复印件,辞职信内容主要是反映了被告人薄熙来妻子薄谷开来杀害英国人尼尔?伍德的事实。   5、公诉人向法庭出示王智写给薄谷开来的悔过书;王鹏飞被刑事立案的原始卷宗材料,证实:王智、王鹏飞被审查后,王智向薄谷开来写出悔过书,后因薄谷开来举报,王鹏飞被以诬告陷害罪于2012年2月16日被重庆市公安局渝中区分局立案侦查,2月18日,在市公安局纪委石子山办案基地,王鹏飞被采取禁闭措施的事实。   6、公诉人向法庭出示中共重庆市委办公厅关于市委秘书长、副秘书长和办公厅副主任分工的通知,渝委办(2011)7、中共重庆市委办公厅关于市委秘书长、副秘书长和办公厅副主任分工的通知,渝委办(2011)148号。上述书证证实,吴某某作为办公厅主任无权对办案人员进行调查。   7、公诉人向法庭出示证人时任重庆市公安局党委书记关某某、纪委副书记王某某2人的工作笔记复印件、情况说明。关某某的情况说明解释了个人工作笔记中记录的2012年2月15日谷薄开来反映王鹏飞诬告陷害的情况及如何采取措施的情况;王某某的自书情况说明解释了个人工作笔记中记录的2012年2月15日至18日的工作情况。   8、公诉人向法庭出示王鹏飞职务任免材料,证实王鹏飞曾任职及被免去重庆市渝北区副区长提名的事实。   9、公诉人向法庭出示重庆市渝北区人大免去王鹏飞副区长职务的相关书证,证实王鹏飞于2012年2月17日被取消渝北区副区长人选提名。   10、公诉人向法庭出示被告人薄熙来签批的重庆市委组织部于2012年2月17日上报的   《关于取消王鹏飞渝北区副区长提名人选资格的请示》,该请示中明确表述有“鉴于王鹏飞涉嫌违法违纪,已对其进行立案调查,建议不作为渝北区副区长提名人选”的内容。薄熙来在该请示上予以签批,证实薄熙来知道并同意对王鹏飞取消副区长提名。   11、公诉人向法庭出示被告人薄熙来圈阅的中共重庆市委组织部《关于部分干部职务调整的建议》、《干部职务调整建议方案》及《重庆市委常委会第156次会议记录》、《重庆市公安局干部会议建议方案》,证实:2012年2月1日下午,由薄熙来主持召开市委常委会,会议决定免去王立军公安局党委书记、局长职务。2月2日,重庆市委组织部在市公安局召开会议,刘某某主持会议,陈某某宣布对王立军的免职决定。   12、公诉人向法庭出示重庆市委组织部于2012年2月1日向公安部政治部发出的《关于王立军、关某某同志职务任免征求意见的函》,中共重庆市委组织部出具的《关于王立军、关某某职务任免征求意见函发出经过》,重庆市委组织部机要件交寄单。证实:2月1日重庆市委常委会后市委组织部将征求意见函传真至公安部政治部地方干部处,2月2日将征求意见函以机要1595号,寄送公安部政治部。   13、公诉人向法庭出示重庆市人民政府办公厅文件,渝办发(2012)25号,《关于市政府领导分工的通知》,市政府常务会议纪要第2期,《市政府第118次常务会议纪要》,证实:自2012年2月1日王立军分管教育、科技等工作,不再分管公安工作。   14、公诉人向法庭出示薄谷开来提议并经被告人薄熙来同意,由大坪医院出具的虚假王立军病情(诊断)证明书,该诊断证明的落款日期为2012年2月4日。公诉人宣读该诊断证明书内容:我院保健小组于2008年7月接市委办公厅通知,患者纳入我院重点保健对象。近年来,患者经常与大坪医院保健小组医生在一起交谈时,曾不断谈到工作压力太大,长期睡眠严重不足,睡眠时间通常只有2一3小时,精神处于高度紧张状态,夜间甚至不敢关灯睡觉。2011年10月,患者因严重睡眠障碍,曾来我院要求进行住院治疗,后因工作繁忙,未能按原计划实施治疗。2011年年底以来,患者几乎每天到大坪医院找医院保健小组医生交谈,保健小组医生发现患者思维迟缓,思考问题及语言表达时缺乏逻辑性,经常出现情绪暴躁、喜怒无常等歇斯底里般的症状,经常出现情绪波动,曾有轻生念头。保健小组会同有关专家小范围进行讨论,认为应该及时用药治疗,但患者拒绝。   2011年2月3日,患者曾2次打电话给大坪医院院长周某,要求次日上午来院详细检查身体和治疗。但始终未来医院就诊。有关专家根据患者上述临床表现,初步诊断患者目前存在严重的抑郁状态和抑郁重度发作。建议组织干预,对患者实施治疗。此证。2012年2月4日。   15、公诉人向法庭出示大坪医院出具的《说明》:由于原重庆市公安局局长王立军在我院诊断治疗资料出于保密的原因,所用姓名为洪铁军。   16、公诉人向法庭出示蒋某某应薄谷开来要求后补的,内容虚假的2012年1月15日、2月10日对王立军病情的讨论记录及病史小结、病情介绍(部分)。   17、公诉人向法庭出示王立军在大坪医院的原始会诊记录、就诊病历资料。病历中记载王立军曾因慢性胃炎、枕神经痛、枕神经带状疙疹、睡眠障碍、焦虑抑郁状态、慢性中耳乳突炎、感音神经性耳聋等就诊,没有王立军存在严重的抑郁状态和抑郁重度发作的记载。   18、公诉人向法庭出示中共重庆市委办公厅《媒体信息专报》。该《专报》内容:“王立军事件”的舆情反应、“王立军事件”的最新舆情动态,证实王立军事件发生后,引发广泛关注,重庆市政府新闻办通过微博发布信息“王立军副市长因长期超负荷工作,精神高度紧张,身体严重不适,经同意,现正在接受休假式的治疗”后,引发网上跟贴、热议。   19、公诉人向法庭出示《中国共产党党员领导干部廉洁从政若干准则》,该《准则》第五条第三项规定:禁止(党员领导干部)利用职权和职务上的影响为亲属及身边工作人员谋取利益。不准有妨碍涉及配偶、子女及其配偶、其他亲属以及身边工作人员案件的调查处理的行为。   20、公诉人向法庭出示2007年4月5日公布,5月1日起施行的《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》,该《条例》第六条规定:行政机关应当及时、准确地公开政府信息。行政机关发现影响或者可能影响社会稳定、扰乱社会管理秩序的虚假或者不完整信。息,应当在其职责范围内发布准确的政府信。息予以澄清。公诉人向法庭出示第三组证据:被告人薄熙来的供述、自书材料、亲笔供词。被告人薄熙来在中央纪委审查期间有自书材料,在侦查阶段亲笔供词,在审查起诉阶段供述。   审判长,证实被告人薄熙来滥用职权犯罪事实的证据向法庭出示完毕。   审判长:被告人对公诉人出示的相关证据进行质证。被告人薄熙来有意见可以发表。辩护人和被告人可以重点发表,相关的辩论意见留到辩论阶段再发表。   被告人:我就对证据本身谈一点感想。公诉人做了大量的工作,我很尊重这些工作。昨天审判长也很关心我,我觉得济南中院是很人道的,在审理过程中是很文明的,我很感谢你们。总的来说公诉人提到的这些证词,我的感觉他们做了大量的调研,很辛苦,但我觉得这些证词实际上有很多是断章取义的,而且几份证词也仅仅取了证人对我不利的那一句话、两句话,而且证人的证词证言前后矛盾。第一,1月29日我打王立军耳光的事。第二,任免王立军的过程。第三,审查王鹏飞的事儿。第四,精神病的诊断证明。第五,开来2月7日也参加的情况。我想补充几个情节,王立军身边的人被审查的失踪这个事情我只说一句话就可以概括“我完全不知情。”刚才吴某某说我指示他去双规,没有任何依据,他这个话他完全是推卸责任,我完全不知道这些情况。还有,关某某说是王鹏飞是我让他双规的,是在撒谎,关某某当时找到我跟我讲谷开来举报王鹏飞要求对他进行审查,我立即跟他说你不要动,你不要处理对谷开来的这些举报信,你根本不要管她。然后过了一段,我把他叫回来,我只是对关某某讲王立军叛逃,谷开来杀人的这个嫌疑,这两件事突如其来,到底是怎么回事?你作为公安局长,应该把这两件事给搞清楚,那时候我还是市委书记。公安局长跑掉了,我让新任的公安局长把事情搞清楚,根本不涉及要求他审查鹏飞的事。实际上关某某是王立军第二,他是钻这个空子,走夫人路线,他当时的心态完全是讨好我,讨好谷开来。我说那行,你让律师看看,他说这个事情涉及到法律问题,是不是让律师也看看。过去在涉及到我的问题上,我不想涉及到别人,但现在我看见关某某这么造谣,我觉得这个人在道德品质上实际让我感觉遗憾。   审判长:请注意措词。   被告人:王立军跑掉,昨天也说了很多。在这个问题有几份证词实际谷开来讲的是很坦率的,也讲的很清楚。   审判长:被告人,你手上的材料是从哪里取得的?   被告人:在案卷里面,我抄下来的。里面谷开来讲王立军出走的主要责任在我,谷开来说她不允许王立军进3号楼,而且每天他都到家里来是我的意见,而我以后又跟王立军有矛盾,我就不允许他的车再进三号,王立军想去看范老太太,也就是她的妈妈,我也没让他去,这是一件事。我让吴某某、关某某来审查王立军身边的工作人员和他的学生。再有一个谷开来也讲,2月2日王立军痛哭流涕自己打自己的耳光等,这些被薄熙来给拿走了,所以王立军很害怕。再有在11.15案件王某签字的公安局证明,那份签字材料是王立军亲手交给我的,但是我没有告诉薄熙来。   被告人:这些事情我并不了解,都是谷开来直接让关某某、吴某某这两个她认为是朋友的人干的,刚才举证的大量书证和我没有关系,还有,关于王立军实际上在这个过程中和他的那些助手们当时到底是个什么心态,王立军当时居然能把11.15的材料全部摆在桌子上,并交给谷开来,以此来向谷开来表示忠心,王立军在跑的前2天,都是和谷开来在联系。我还想说一下王立军的这些学生不像是公诉人说的那样一身正气,我举一个例子,谷开来曾经请王智、王鹏飞、李某3人一块吃饭,就是要在他们之间商量如何化解这些矛盾,我个人认为就是一场闹剧,这是谷开来和王立军共同在导演的,吴某某当时其实是当了谷开来的帮凶,现在却想把责任往我身上推,吴某某和关某某的证言,我认为都是不真实的。再有,王立军说失踪的人是谷开来让王立军抓的,和我无关系,是王立军自己把他手下的人抓起来的,谷开来还说,我和王立军说我一会儿就去审问他们,谷开来还说了审查时还叫着吴某某,说他是市委办公厅主任,这与我毫无关系,这是个闹剧,这是吴某某、谷开来、王立军一块编导的,和我无关系。   审判长:法庭调查是为听取控辩双方对证据的意见。   被告人:关于王立军的病情关某某曾经有过证词,这也是律师向我核对证据时我摘录的,他当时讲王立军身体状态不行,睡眠不足,精神崩溃,已引起干警队伍不稳定,王立军自己还提出要对其进行减压,应调整对其的分工之类的话,还有,关于吴某某有一段证词,他讲2月7日凌晨吴某某说我和翁某某、王某就王立军叛逃事件进入3号楼向薄熙来汇报,当时薄熙来、谷开来都在。关于开会的事,关于重庆市公安局2月4日的交接,我当时讲的意见,一是王立军关某某的工作都很重要,要稳妥地交接,二要交接好,要充分肯定王立军以往的成绩,三要保持社会的稳定,2月3号2月4日是重庆开大会交接的日子,我建议王立军暂缓到北京开会,没有限制他自由的意见。现在一直说我免掉王立军局长的职务,这是错误的,我只是调整了王立军的分工,让他负责工商、教育、科技,这几个部分都是重庆的精华的所在,我本人绝无贬低他的意见,因为重庆的7个副市长都没有一个兼任局长的。我确实是免掉了王立军的局长职务,但是这是一个综合体,是一个调整分工的过程。   被告人:我有失误,而且我觉得王立军整出这么多麻烦事来,我觉得确实需要换一换岗位,清静一下,沉淀一下,有好处,我丝毫没有贬低他的意思。最后还有涉及王鹏飞副区长的事,公诉人有一系列证据说我不赞成王鹏飞当副区长。事实上是关某某在2月14日左右跟我谈到还有一个王鹏飞当副区长的事妥不妥,其实王鹏飞、王智、李阳这几个人站在我眼前我也认不出来,我和他们差好几级,从来对他们就没有印象。王鹏飞这个事我没有印象,关某某在我办公室跟我讲了谷开来那封信的事之后,又主动跟我提起王鹏飞任副区长的事,我的印象中过去没有任何人给我提起过,我没有印象。他提示我风头上任命王鹏飞合不合适,我确实马上联想到,王立军刚刚叛逃,他是王立军的弟子,众所周知,且从东北带来的,在这个风头上再当副区长,拿去选举合不合适?   审判长:被告人,本庭注意到你的两位律师在庭前会议上,在公诉人展示证据时,已将公诉人展示的所有证据都予以复制,在法院接收公诉人提交的新的材料时,辩护人也都及时赶到济南复制材料。本庭注意到辩护人已经很好地熟悉了材料,了解了案件的焦点和重点,下面由你的辩护人再发表一下意见。   辩护人:第一,王立军汇报后斥责王立军并打他耳光,这在薄谷开来、郭维国和王立军的证言,都可以证实,2012年1月13日薄谷开来杀完人以后,14号就告诉了王立军,15号就告诉了郭维国,郭维国15号又及时向王立军汇报了这个事实。即王立军不仅仅只听到薄谷开来讲,还听了郭维国讲。就是说作为公安局长,他应该怎么做他自己很清楚,案件未能及时查处,王立军首当其冲,是他的责任,这一责任已经被生效判决认定为询私枉法罪,该罪的主要内容就是包庇谷开来,这是第一个事。   1月28日晚王立军见完被告人后回到他的办公室,大约11点,徐明讲他到了王立军办公室,当时马某也在,见面后,我觉得王立军很兴奋,还说几个参与办尼尔伍德案的人都需要辞职,这些事都是王立军他压着。1月29日上午,被告人打了王立军的耳光,下午郭维国与王立军在一块的时候,对王立军说,既然薄熙来打了你耳光,说“既然咱们这样做不好,还不如把整个事情盖子揭开”,即谷开来杀人案揭开。   被告人:审判长,我申请插一句话。   审判长:可以。   被告人:辩护人讲到王立军想敲诈我,包括郭维国、徐明的证明,这个事他没跟我明确提过,我也从来没答应过他,我当时的心态对王立军的胡言乱语有深刻的看法,所以第二天我的火才这么大。   审判长:辩护人继续。   辩护人:按王立军昨天自己的说法,连他本人都不相信薄谷开来杀人的情况下,还有薄谷开来否认的情况下,又拿出了王某的证明,被告人当然有理由怀疑他说谎,在这种情况下又识破了王立军敲诈的目的,所以这才是打他的真正原因。   辩护人:但是根据证人王某某也就是公安局副局长的证言说,关某某见王某某时说这个事要立案侦查,这个事是被告人让办的,你一定要办,有什么事我负责任,说明关某某在自作主张,被告并没有让你对王鹏飞立案侦查。他自作主张做了这么个事儿,案发后又将责任推到被告人身上,后来对王鹏飞进行立案侦查的理由是因为他私自领取枪支,脱岗三天,因为在王立军出走美领馆以后,他作为公安岗位上的重要负责人,手机连着三天打不通,三天中王鹏飞还给王立军出逃美国领馆提供车辆。基于这些事,当时对王鹏飞进行立案侦查与本案所指控的11.15案没有关系,所以王鹏飞立案侦查与本案被告人没有关系。同时在这里边还要讲一下,证人周某明确讲,关于王鹏飞副区长提名取消的问题,周某讲被告人没有给他打过电话,陈某某的证言里说的很清楚,是公安局向组织部报了,在案书证里也有公安局向组织报的,所以陈某某才向被告提起王鹏飞这个事,并不是被告人主动说。也就是说最后被告人只是同意了取消王鹏飞提名这么个事。同时,在案的判决书也能够证明事后实际上王鹏飞被判了拘私枉法罪。这个像刚才被告人所讲,如果同意了他,等于同意罪犯去当副区长了。对王立军免职这个事,证人黄某某、陈某某、张某等人能够证实:在开会讨论以前,被告人分头征询这些人的意见,这些人没有一个提出反对意见,同时也有当时的会议记录,会议记录上所有的人都是没意见,都同意对王立军的工作进行调整,虽然在证据里面陈某某提醒过被告人要注意程序,但是他工作调整这个决定做出以后,具体到公安局去宣布这个决定的时候是陈某某和刘某某,这二人并没有提出不同意见,或者说我们现在不能去,在公安局的证言中都体现不出这一点,因此说决定调整王立军的工作,宣布对他的工作进行调整,整个过程是一个集体决策,而不是被告人一人决策的。接下来是关于纵容谷开来参与应对这个事儿,证人翁某某、王某、吴某某的证言,这个事是2月7日零晨一点左右,在被告人家里,当时被告人和谷开来已休息,在这个特殊的环境下,不是被告人有意要求谷开来参加这个事,是谷开来先下的楼,在这种情况下,谷开来听到了这些情况,就插了句话,他有精神病,是否以这个理由而对外宣传,而不是有意的让她来。吴某某和谷开来的证言,医院的相关人员都能够证实王立军有病的相关情况。   审判长:你这段发言的目的,重点想说明什么问题?   辩护人:我说这些证人证言证明的事实,我从另外一方面来解读。   审判长:关于本节的事实、控辩双方的意见本庭已听清,被告人还有需要发表的意见吗?   被告人:讲到1月29日我摔杯子表明态度,不论是郭维国、吴某某的证言,都是他们自己的主观推想,或者有的认为我表明对11.15案的否定,或者认为我不让查,或者认为我与王立军怎么了,我当时就是摔了个杯子,我自己修养不够。谷开来讲,我告诉谷开来11.15案你杀人的事是王立军对你的诬陷,这个事情是她对我讲,怎么现在成了我告诉谷开来是王立军诬陷你?谷开来讲是我要查王鹏飞和王智,这太离奇了。   审判长:你坚持刚才的观点,认为谷开来、吴某某反映的相关证言都不是真实的?   被告人:这都不是真实的。王立军讲,我一拳打过去,医院有证明,是穿孔,请法庭调查,我当时是打了王立军一巴掌,我想知道鼓膜穿孔怎么造成的,公诉人讲到,关某某讲说到任以后我从来没有安排他复查11.15案件,实际上这是不真实的,实际上2月14日他找我的时候,我马上给他讲应该查清。   审判长:你认为关某某的证言也是不真实的?   被告人:对。   被告人:我建议公诉人不要在起诉我的过程中给王立军开脱罪责。   公诉人:鉴于被告人和辩护人发表的更多的意见没有对公诉人举证的证据进行质证,对此我们将在法庭辩论再予以详细的阐述认定被告人薄熙来犯滥用职权罪的意见。   审判长:现在对本案案发情况、涉案款物扣押冻结情况等事实进行法庭调查。请公诉人就该部分事实进行举证。下面,公诉人向法庭出示一组综合证据:   1、公诉人出示最高人民检察院反贪污贿赂总局于2013年5月27日出具的《发破案经过说明》,证实案件侦破情况。最高人民检察院于2012年9月28日对薄熙来以涉嫌受贿罪立案侦查,同年9月29日,经最高人民检察院决定,由北京市公安局对其执行逮捕。   2、公诉人出示最高人民检察院《立案决定书》、《逮捕决定书》、《逮捕通知书》、《指定管辖的通知》、北京市公安局《逮捕证》,以及最高人民检察院反贪污贿赂总局于2013年5月18日出具的《关于执行逮捕情况说明》,证实案件立案、对被告人采取强制措施、案件指定管辖的情况。   3、公诉人出示办案机关、办案人出具的《情况说明》、《办案说明》,证实在案证据均依法调取,被告人没有自首、坦白、检举揭发等情节。   4、公诉人出示赃款赃物扣押、冻结法律文书,证实追缴被告人薄熙来受贿、贪污犯罪所得2680.6708万元。   5、公诉人出示被告人薄熙来的户籍证明,证实被告人薄熙来身份。审判长,本组证据向法庭出示完毕。审判长,起诉书指控被告人薄熙来犯受贿罪、贪污罪、滥用职权罪的全部证据出示完毕。   审判长:对本组证据被告人有无异议?   被告人:没有意见。   审判长:对本组证据辩护人有无异议?   辩护人:没有意见。   审判长:被告人对全案的事实还有无证据向法庭提交?   被告人:对于王立军叛逃案件中我的责任,我刚才讲的所有的话,都是对于公诉人提供的证据讲的话,我的意见将会在辩论阶段再来表述。   审判长:被告人对全案还有没有证据需要向法庭出示?   被告人:现在我没有证据需要当庭提交法庭质证。   审判长:辩护人对全案还有没有证据需要向法庭出示?   辩护人:没有证据。   审判长:被告人和辩护人,除被告人和辩护人庭前调查时所提出的取证申请外,被告人和辩护人还有无新的申请?   被告人:没有。   辩护人:没有。   审判长:法庭调查结束。
个人分类: 薄案庭审记录|9764 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 桑兰案新律师开炮了
热度 15 岳东晓 2012-10-8 17:19
桑兰案新律师开炮了
(未经本人书面许可,不得转载) 在海明签署认罪书退下之后,桑兰的新律师徐晓冰一直没有动静,乃至引人怀疑桑兰案是否已经无疾而终了。其实,这都是决战前的无线电静默。现在,桑兰及徐律师开炮了,而且是多管火箭炮齐射。 先让我们回顾一下桑兰案的之前的过程。桑兰案最初起诉了TIME WARNER,几个保险公司与几个华人被告(包括桑兰之前的监护人KS LIU,律师莫虎等)。后来,海明主动对TIME WARNER撤诉,与保险公司则达成和解。而几名华裔被告则动议法庭撤诉,要求对海明进行制裁。案子的副法官认为海明的行为已经违背美国民事诉讼程序规则第11条,可以制裁,并且建议撤销部分控告。海明在威慑之下,为逃避惩罚,签订了认罪书,与被告和解。但是后来主审法官认为海明不应被罚,而且允许桑兰在另外两项指控上修改状纸。我在当时即报道,桑兰案有三项无条件成活,另外三项修改状纸成活。我对桑兰案的19大预测,参见 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_607d3a300102dyq6.html 。 2012年10月5日,桑兰向美国联邦法院发出动议,要求递交第四版修改起诉书(简称4AC)。下面,我主要介绍一下桑兰案最新状纸的新内容。 在4AC里,桑兰说当年受伤是因为运动会组织者TIME WARNER(时代华纳)管理不善导致场地混乱,桑兰正在高速冲刺跳马时,一罗马尼亚教练突然出现在着落区,将垫子挪动,导致桑兰受到干扰,腾空后未能正确着落,而是头部着地、颈椎断裂,关键神经遭到粉碎性损伤。而组织者为了逃避责任,隐瞒、销毁事故过程的录像。事故发生后,时代华纳坚称没有任何录像记录;而最新的证据表明,现场有多台摄像机拍摄。时代华纳甚至威胁一位拍摄了现场录像的卡特先生不得将录像泄露。这种刻意隐瞒导致桑兰失去了追究责任的证据。桑兰受伤的新闻公布后,引起美国社会的广泛同情,TIME WARNER在媒体上信誓旦旦地宣称要照顾桑兰及其家庭,这也导致桑兰没有去追究法律责任,但时至今日TIME WARNER却又拒绝兑现其承诺。因此,桑兰起诉TIME WARNER违背合同、背信弃义等等。 另外,桑兰指控:莫虎之前是她的律师,她多次向他提出法律咨询,莫虎为了利用她的名气也多次在媒体上自称为桑兰的律师;莫虎既是桑兰的律师,又是被告的律师,莫虎却没有告知桑兰可能的利益冲突;在很多事情方面(如桑兰基金管理),莫虎没有尽到其受托人的责任,导致桑兰基金账目不明。莫虎再次被推上了被告席。 针对KS LIU等人,桑兰的指控似乎得到了大大的强化。特别是诽谤与侵犯隐私方面的内容。大家可以参见4AC。状纸说桑兰的伤导致她从胸部以下完全瘫痪,大小便不能自理,小便如不及时排出就有尿毒危险;由于血液循环不善,下肢经常发青; 由于无法自主活动,肌肉萎缩,骨骼结构也变得松弛;每天晚上桑兰父母都得起来将桑兰身体翻个,以免长疮。由一个充满前途的、单纯的运动员,变成这样艰难的生存,桑兰挺过来了。但被告却说桑兰懒惰到大小便都不愿自己解,还说通过与中国政府官员的关系给桑兰介绍了工作,桑兰却因为懒而不愿干活,等等。桑兰认为,被告明知其伤情,却攻击她懒惰、贪婪、不知感恩,属于恶意诽谤,其造成的损害极为严重。我在之前曾分析,扭腰唐人街华人是进不了桑兰案陪审团的,如果把相关案情讲给美国人构成的陪审团听,他们肯定出离愤怒。桑兰是名人,其名誉的价值很难估算,全靠陪审团裁定。 桑兰还增加了侵吞其财产的指控,她说美国各界名人(如朱镕基、克林顿、里根、卡特、戈尔等政界人士以及众多歌星、影星、球星)送给她的礼物、纪念品等等都被被告侵吞了,她要要回来。 更为惊人的是,桑兰指控多名匿名人士利用SINOVISION网站对其进行诽谤、抹黑,而且这些人假冒被告的支持者,实为被告的打手,他们用恶毒、下流、贬低的语言对桑兰进行持续的人身攻击。桑兰直接点名的ID有“孙鹰”,“卓玛”与“毛茂”。据4AC称,被告与该网站的负责人经常会面,商讨网站运营事宜,其利用该网站攻击桑兰,实属阴谋。桑兰称,被告们的阴谋诽谤导致整个互联网充斥着对桑兰的贬损,给她及家人带来无穷的痛苦,给她的名誉带来极大的损害。为此,桑兰起诉30名匿名人士。我在之前曾分析,《 桑兰案追查匿名攻击者或许是一步好棋 》。现在看来,这也许是桑兰案的一个突破口。 这个4AC长达74页,有兴趣的可以参阅附件PDF。等我有时间,再做分析。 (未经本人书面许可,上文不得转载) 附件: 桑兰案起诉书第4版(4AC)下载(PDF)
16330 次阅读|43 个评论

Archiver|手机版|珍珠湾全球网

GMT+8, 2024-6-1 03:23 , Processed in 0.066243 second(s), 14 queries , Apc On.

Powered by Discuz! X2.5

回顶部