| Date | Description | Notes |
|---|
| 04/18/2017 | Notice of appeal lodged/received. | Filed 4/7/2017 by William Pohl, counsel for Defendant Muye Liu
|
| 04/18/2017 | Notified parties of local rules and procedures. |
|
| 04/18/2017 | Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c). |
|
| 04/28/2017 | Filing fee. | appellant
|
| 05/01/2017 | Returned document for non-conformance. | civil case information statement rejected on TrueFiling; missing copy of judgment/order being appealed
|
| 05/01/2017 | Civil case information statement filed. | Defendant and Appellant: Trigmax Solutions LLC
Attorney: William N. Pohl
|
| 05/15/2017 | Appellant's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: | 5/2/2017, designating CT without RT
|
| 05/18/2017 | Appellant's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: | AMENDED 5/8/2017, designating CT without RT
|
| 08/22/2017 | Record on appeal filed. | CT-1 (FILED ELECTRONICALLY)
|
| 09/28/2017 | Requested - extension of time. |
Appellant's opening brief. Requested for 11/28/2017 By 57 Day(s)
|
| 09/28/2017 | Granted - extension of time. |
Appellant's opening brief. Due on 11/17/2017 By 46 Day(s)
|
| 11/17/2017 | Email sent to: | William Pohl: Dear Mr. Pohl: I've received your opening brief in this case. However, I can't file it because it does not include a proof of service of the brief on the superior court. This is required by the California Rules of Court, Rule 8.212(c)(1). So I will note that the brief has been received, and I will set a deadline of Monday, November 20 to get that proof of service. I will file your opening brief when I get that. You do not need to re-file the brief. Thanks for your attention to this. Please call or e-mail me if you have questions. Annie Reasoner Deputy Clerk, Division Five
|
| 11/17/2017 | Appellant's opening brief. | Defendant and Appellant: Muye Liu
Defendant and Appellant: Trigmax Solutions LLC
Attorney: William N. Pohl
|
| 11/17/2017 | Filed proof of service. | Proor of service of opening brief on superior court, from William Pohl, attorney for appellan Trigmax
|
| 12/18/2017 | Respondent's brief. | Plaintiff and Respondent: Dongxiao Yue
Pro Per
|
| 01/08/2018 | Email sent to: | attorney William Pohl for appellant; Counsel, The attached briefs lack a word count certificate. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(c).) Please submit word count certificates for each brief immediately. The reply brief will not be filed until a word count certificate is filed.
|
| 01/08/2018 | Appellant's reply brief. | Defendant and Appellant: Trigmax Solutions LLC
Attorney: William N. Pohl received; contains proof of service that was merged in TrueFiling
|
| 01/08/2018 | Appellant's reply brief. | Defendant and Appellant: Trigmax Solutions LLC
Attorney: William N. Pohl
|
| 01/08/2018 | Filed document entitled: | Word Count certificate for appellant's reply brief
|
| 01/08/2018 | Filed document entitled: | Word Count Certificate for opening brief
|
| 01/08/2018 | Case fully briefed. |
|
| 02/01/2018 | Oral argument waiver notice sent. |
|
| 02/13/2018 | Request for oral argument filed by: | attorney William Pohl for appellant
|
| 03/08/2018 | Calendar notice sent. Calendar date: | April 19, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
|
| 04/12/2018 | Order filed. | BY THE COURT: This appeal is scheduled for oral argument on April 19, 2018, on the court's 10:00 a.m. calendar. The court has reviewed the issues that have been raised and has determined that each side will be allocated 10 minutes for argument. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.256(c).)
|
| 04/19/2018 | Cause argued and submitted. |
|
| 04/30/2018 | Opinion filed. | (Signed Unpublished) The order partially denying defendants' anti-SLAPP motion is affirmed. Yue is awarded costs on appeal. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a).)
|
