用户注册 登录
珍珠湾全球网 返回首页

MingHao的个人空间 http://ohaiwan.com/?15580 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

日志

Column: Asian American judge challenges racism inherent in ‘equity’

已有 447 次阅读2021-4-7 22:58 |个人分类:美国华人|系统分类:转帖--非原创请选择

https://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/hss/2018-12.pdf


5 D’s of Bystander / Upstander Intervention: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e1b96b78d93e3087ddd7675/t/5e47147f0310305ee6929a60/1581716608382/Toolbox_The+5+Ds+of+Bystander+Intervention.pdf


https://www.unicef.org/parenting/talking-to-your-kids-about-racism

https://www.pbs.org/parents/thrive/how-to-talk-honestly-with-children-about-racism

https://www.aclusocal.org/en/seths-law

https://www.nj.gov/education/students/safety/behavior/hib/ParentGuide.pdf

Judge Ho still experiences racist hate. He says racism isn’t over. Yet he understands the dangers of categorizing, dividing, rewarding or punishing Americans by the use of immutable characteristics like skin pigment.

This is the definition of racism. This is what racists do.

He argues that equality of opportunity, not of outcomes, is fundamental to who we are as Americans.

He also argues that the new policy of “equity” pushed by the Democratic Party — that attempts to guarantee outcomes on the basis of race — is poisonous and racist.

Equality of opportunity, said Ho, means two things:

“It means we must do everything we can to ensure that everyone truly has the opportunity to succeed. And it means we must never bend the rules to favor anyone. Dr. King had it right: Choose people based on who they are, not what they look like.

“We must make sure that everyone has the opportunity to learn and to succeed, so that win, lose or draw, at least you got a chance — no matter who you are …

“But here’s the kicker: Once everyone has had full and fair opportunity to be considered, you pick on the merits. Both the Constitution and the Civil Rights Act make it clear that it is wrong to hire people based on race. That’s the law for a wide range of jobs. But it would be especially wrong to select judges based on race.”

Ho is the only Asian American on his court. He is the only immigrant on his court.

“But I would never suggest that a wise Asian would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than a white judge,” he said. “That would be antithetical to our legal system and poisonous to civil society. No one should ever assume that I’m more likely to favor Asians or immigrants or anyone else — or that my colleagues are less likely to. Everyone should win or lose based on the law, period. That’s why Lady Justice wears a blindfold. That’s why judges wear black robes.”

Stop and consider how quickly we’re being herded down this poisonous path where “equality” is replaced by “equity.” The similar-sounding words are offered up, confusingly, on a regular basis without context in “straight” news media accounts and by Democratic Party politicians as if they were one and the same.

They’re not the same. Only one is about opportunity for all, which is why a poor immigrant from postwar Europe, who plowed his fields with a mule, could see one of his American-born sons rise in government service and another become a newspaper columnist. It is why Judge Ho’s parents came to America.

In high school, Ho’s college admissions adviser told him that his grades and test scores were “all strong enough to get me into my top choice of schools — if I wasn’t Asian.”

“I come to my views because racism is not behind us,” he said. “The last thing we should do is divide people by race. The last thing we should do is suggest the racists are right. We don’t achieve equality of opportunity by denying it to anyone — we achieve it by securing it for everyone.

“So make no mistake: It would be profoundly offensive — and un-American — to tell the world you’re restricting a judgeship to members of only one race. It’s offensive to people of other races. And it’s offensive to people of that race because you’re suggesting the only way they’ll get the job is if you rig the rules in their favor.”

Ho is a conservative. If you didn’t read about his comments in the news or hear or see them on radio or TV, you might want to ask yourself: Why not?

It is the message or the messenger?

It just might be both.

Want more John Kass? See all his columns and find his weekly podcast here.

Twitter @John_Kass


路过

鸡蛋

鲜花

支持

雷人

难过

搞笑
 

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 用户注册

Archiver|手机版|珍珠湾全球网

GMT+8, 2021-5-6 08:00 , Processed in 0.024490 second(s), 8 queries , Apc On.

Powered by Discuz! X2.5

回顶部